在线国产一区二区_成人黄色片在线观看_国产成人免费_日韩精品免费在线视频_亚洲精品美女久久_欧美一级免费在线观看

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
World
Home / World / China-US

A false narrative fuels trade war

By Stephen Roach | China Daily Global | Updated: 2019-05-21 08:59
Share
Share - WeChat
[Photo/IC]

Amid charges and countercharges, the US-China trade conflict has now moved squarely into the danger zone. And in light of the sharp recent escalation of pressures from the US side-the US hike in tariffs this month from 10 percent to 25 percent on $200 billion of Chinese exports, a promise of additional tariffs on $325 billion of exports, and a full frontal assault on Huawei-even the odds of a cosmetic agreement are slipping by the day.

Washington's penchant for China-bashing has been taken to an entirely new level. Republicans and Democrats agree on very little these days. But blaming China for America's economic ills resonates across the political spectrum.

The Republican Party, once the pro-business constituency of free trade, has now embraced tariffs with open arms. For pro-working class Democrats, many of whom have long warned of the perils of globalization and trade liberalization, the transformation into tariff warriors has been relatively easy. After years of abusive trade practices, goes the bipartisan rhetoric, it is high time America stood up against China.

Today's China-bashing has gone well beyond the strain of anti-Japan sentiment that was evident some 30 years ago. Back then, the US manufacturing sector was experiencing its first taste of pressures on jobs and real wages that could be traced to a sharply widening trade deficit. A mercantilist Japan was the culprit. Now Washington has embraced different and tougher tactics to address a Chinese threat that it judges to be far more serious than the one that arose from Japan.

From Japan to China, the United States has been quick to see itself as the victim, choosing to blame others for economic problems that are very much of its own making. Yet this blame game flies in the face of some of the basic and most elementary principles of macroeconomics. Economics students are quickly taught the simple national income accounting identity that investment must always equal savings. The problem comes in the corollary: When nations are short of savings and want to invest and grow, they must borrow surplus savings from abroad and run current account deficits in order to attract the foreign capital. These balance-of-payments deficits-which the US has experienced in almost every year since 1982-are a recipe for trade deficits. But since the trade deficits stem from macro saving-investment imbalances, they tend to be broad based, or multilateral, in scope. Indeed, in 2018, the United States had merchandise trade deficits with 102 countries.

Therein lies the pitfalls of China-bashing. Yes, China accounted for fully 48 percent of America's massive $879 billion merchandise trade deficit in 2018. That makes it a lightning rod in the current US policy debate. Eliminating the Chinese piece of the deficit, goes the argument, is the only way to "make America great again" and thereby alleviate pressures on US workers.

If only it were that easy. For a savings-short US economy, there is no bilateral fix for a multilateral problem. Eliminating one piece of the trade deficit without fixing the savings problem-a very real possibility in light of a further depression of domestic saving following the tax cuts of late 2017-simply means that trade will be diverted from China to other foreign producers. Inasmuch as China is one of America's lowest-cost foreign suppliers, that means the trade diversion will invariably go to higher-cost foreign producers-the functional equivalent of a tax hike on US consumers.

The likelihood that China-bashing will backfire for a savings-short US economy raises a far deeper question: Why does Washington pursue such a flagrantly inconsistent strategy? The answer is as much an outgrowth of hegemonic overreach as it is a reflection of China's alleged unfair trading practices. With the dollar pre-eminent as the world's reserve currency, the United States has developed a sense of entitlement toward open-ended budget deficits that are funded by dollar-denominated debt issuance in its own currency.

Washington would rather blame others than take a long hard look in the mirror.

The tragic irony of a possible trade deal, if it does occur, is that it is likely to focus on a multiyear commitment by China to purchase over $1 trillion of US-made goods in an effort to narrow the bilateral trade imbalance between the two nations. This is pure political theater at its worst-underscoring the folly of a bilateral fix for a multilateral problem. It is based on the false premise that this "solution" will address the squeeze on US manufacturing and provide relief to pressures on jobs and real wages of factory workers. Yet nothing could be further from the truth for savings-short America. The bilateral fix is a recipe for trade diversion that does next to nothing to provide lasting relief for US workers and consumers.

Most significantly, the fixation on the bilateral trade deficit fails to address the structural issues that threaten lasting tensions between the two nations. Market access is at the top of that list-the opportunity of multinational corporations in both nations to invest freely in each other's markets. The US claims that China's joint venture requirements imposed on such investments is a recipe for forced technology transfer. Once again, the false narrative apparently matters more than fact-based analytics.

The United States and China are on a collision course. The world's two largest economies have accounted for fully 44 percent of world GDP growth since 2008. If they opt for a superficial resolution or fail to come to terms on their trade conflict, the global economy could well falter. Now, more than ever, a fragile world is in desperate need of political will and wisdom-and a leadership courage that is sorely lacking today.

The author is a faculty member at Yale University and former chairman of Morgan Stanley Asia. The views do not necessarily reflect those of China Daily.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 久久久亚洲精品视频 | 97av超碰| 日韩欧美国产网站 | 国产精品久久久久久久久久久久久久 | 七七婷婷婷婷精品国产 | 亚洲成人av在线 | 伊人春色在线播放 | 四虎亚洲精品 | 中文字幕精品三区 | 久久久网站 | 欧美日韩成人激情 | 国产一区二区免费视频 | 成人免费福利 | 亚洲一区中文字幕 | 人人插人人爽 | 黄色av网 | 欧美一区二区精品久久 | 国产精品久久久久久久久免费丝袜 | 欧洲成人午夜免费大片 | 久久精品小视频 | 91在线一区二区 | 国产91在线免费观看 | 在线观看免费av的网址 | 一区二区精品视频 | 国产精品福利在线观看 | 日韩在线视频免费观看 | 欧美在线播放一区 | 久久久网| 精品久久一区二区三区 | 欲色av| 国产欧美久久一区二区三区 | 特级黄一级播放 | 九色在线播放 | 欧美一区二区三区视频 | 涩999| 日本在线天堂 | 国产在线小视频 | 国产一级免费网站 | 天堂色| 日本超碰 | 中文 日韩 欧美 |