在线国产一区二区_成人黄色片在线观看_国产成人免费_日韩精品免费在线视频_亚洲精品美女久久_欧美一级免费在线观看

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Top news

Trade reports use differing language, but conclusion draws near

By Zhang Zhouxiang | chinadaily.com.cn | Updated: 2019-10-14 22:18
Share
Share - WeChat

How are the China-US trade negotiations going in Washington? 

It depends on which media outlet you rely on to get your information. On Saturday, hours after "substantial progress" was made on economic and trade issues of common concern in their latest round of negotiations, US President Donald Trump met Chinese vice-Premier Liu He, head of the Chinese delegation.

According to Xinhua News Agency, Trump was pleased to see the US-China trade negotiations have yielded "substantial phase-one" progress, and said he hopes the two negotiation teams will keep up efforts, finalize the text of the "phase-one deal" at an early date and move forward with future negotiations.

Xinhua also quoted Liu as saying substantial progress was made in areas including agriculture, intellectual property rights protection, exchange rate, financial services, expansion of trade cooperation, technology transfer and dispute settlement.

That's echoed by Trump's own tweet that day, which, in his typical style, said he just made "the greatest and biggest deal ever made" for farmers in US history.

However, when quoting Xinhua, Bloomberg noticed minor differences in the language of the two sides. It quoted Xinhua as saying "negotiators made efforts toward a final agreement, but stopped short of calling Friday's outcome a deal".

In some sense they are right, because Chinese media outlets did not delve into many details in their reports, but just reviewed some of the fields they discussed. In deep contrast, US media outlets, such as Bloomberg itself, have already been talking about China buying more agricultural products from the US and the US delaying a tariff increase due next week.

That's more like a cultural gap rather than either side being mistaken. Chinese media outlets, like Chinese governmental staff, tend to be more careful and avoid making firm pronouncements about what will happen until they truly happen, while US media outlets are better at "firing from the hip" with what they have after first brush.

A glance at the Wall Street Journal will help deepen understanding of the US media outlet's "get-it-first" style. It said "The two sides left many details to be worked out in the weeks or months ahead on tough issues", while quoting a trade expert as saying the US "could have achieved these results a year ago or more".

It is hard to understand how they knew what they could reach without knowing the details of what was agreed at the negotiation.

Whatever differences exist between the two countries' reports, one thing is certain: China and the US have reached consensus. Trump announced progress to the media in the presence of Liu, calling what they reached an "agreement".

In China's text, there is no use of the word "agreement", but all words lead in that direction. Liu described the discussions as "candid, efficient and constructive", and included words like "substantial progress".

More importantly, the Chinese delegation did not object when Trump uttered the word "agreement".

It is safe to guess the two sides have "agreed" with each other on something, and the only difference lies in the US side calling it an "agreement" right now and the Chinese side not calling it so until the last word is uttered and the signatures secured.

That in turn sheds light on future discussions: There are always cultural differences, there might be misunderstandings based on cultural gaps and the delegations from both sides face not only their counterparts, but also public opinion.

But none of these will prevent them from reaching a final agreement, which will serve the fundamental interests of the two countries and their peoples.

Ma Chi contributed to this story.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 91污在线| 国产精品久久久久免费a∨ 国产激情一区二区三区 | 欧美亚洲专区 | 国产伦精品一区二区 | 亚洲一级在线免费观看 | 久久狠 | 韩国毛片在线观看 | 成人毛片在线观看 | 伊人网国产 | 久久久久久久国产精品影院 | 在线播放一区二区三区 | 欧美日韩首页 | 欧美日韩第一区 | 视频一区二区三 | 91偷拍精品一区二区三区 | 涩涩涩涩涩涩涩 | 久久小视频 | 在线看一区二区 | 五月婷婷综合激情 | 欧美在线免费 | 黄色网址网站在线观看 | 久久久999国产 | av av在线| 亚洲精品国产成人 | 91精品国产乱码久久久久久久久 | 国产片一区二区三区 | 亚洲国产精品久久久男人的天堂 | 日韩精品一区二区三区四区视频 | 国产视频一区二区 | 少妇淫片aaaaa毛片叫床爽 | 超碰在线播 | 国产剧情一区二区 | 犬夜叉在线观看 | 久久精品二区 | 欧美日韩最新 | 成人1区2区 | 呦呦av在线 | 伊人色综合网 | 国产精品久久久久久久久 | 蜜桃一本色道久久综合亚洲精品冫 | 欧美激情一区二区三级高清视频 |