在线国产一区二区_成人黄色片在线观看_国产成人免费_日韩精品免费在线视频_亚洲精品美女久久_欧美一级免费在线观看

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / From the Press

Anti-China disinformation -- Washington's geopolitical weapon under pretext of so-called "press freedom"

Xinhua | Updated: 2022-02-23 15:34
Share
Share - WeChat
Song Chen / China Daily

The US House of Representatives has passed the America COMPETES Act, appropriating 500 million US dollars for news coverage to malign China. The move makes people wonder how the self-styled "beacon of press freedom" dares to openly manipulate media in an attempt to squeeze China out of what it calls a "Great Power Competition."

The bill, passed earlier this month as an industrial policy plan for semiconductor production and supply chain resilience, will direct funding to the US Agency for Global Media, a US media service, as well as local outlets and programs to produce journalism that is critical of China, particularly the China-proposed Belt and Road Initiative.

From the Spanish-American War and World War I to the Cold War, the Gulf War and the Iraq War, US propaganda has been omnipresent. These days, Washington's disinformation campaign against Beijing is reminiscent of its playbook during the Cold War, when it denigrated the Soviet Union through mass media, stoked hysteria over the "Communist Threat" and boycotted the 1980 Moscow Summer Olympics.

Last year, Zimbabwe's The Herald newspaper revealed that local journalists were allegedly offered 1,000 US dollars by a proxy of the US embassy for each anti-China story they wrote to portray Chinese businesses based there as unethical, reckless and harmful to local communities.

"Out of sheer jealousy, envy and pique, Western countries have begun a spirited campaign against Chinese investments in Zimbabwe using a phalanx of corrupt media, paid activists and civil society organizations," The Herald wrote.

Not coincidentally, in September 2021, Javier Garcia, then head of the Beijing office of Spain's EFE News Agency, announced his decision to leave journalism because "the embarrassing information war against China has taken a good dose of my enthusiasm for this profession."

This time, the bill claims US-funded media coverage would be "independent." Considering the news reports are sponsored by Washington with the precise aims of crowding out Chinese investment in developing countries and smearing China's projects, the claim is nonsense.

"If the government is setting out ahead of time in legislation what the conclusion and the point of coverage is going to be, that doesn't really qualify as genuine journalism," Tobita Chow, the director of Justice is Global, a US advocacy group, was quoted by the American Prospect magazine, as saying.

By spreading misinformation and disinformation in traditional and social media, Washington is trying to enclose audiences at home and abroad into echo chambers built on its Cold War mindset. Nonetheless, its old playbook no longer applies in today's world, where truth and multipolarity prevail over lies and hegemonism.

Obsessed with meddling in the internal affairs of other countries, the United States has failed to understand why Chinese businesses and investment overseas continue to thrive: Because China has always upheld the principles of extensive consultation, joint contribution and shared benefits when partnering with other countries and abstains from internal interference.

Meanwhile, suppose Washington does hope to create some competitive advantage for its foreign investment. In that case, it should provide mutually beneficial loans to developing countries instead of narrowly focusing on its own interests and pouring money into shaming China.

Between the infrastructure plan proposed by China and the versions by the United States and the European Union, many low- and middle-income countries prefer Chinese investment, since rich countries, which see developing countries as high risk plus low reward, often impose onerous conditions that delay project implementation and increase costs, according to a recent article in The Diplomat magazine.

China's approach is different: It speaks up for developing countries and thus obtains their support.

In the wake of increasing rhetoric against China, Zimbabwean President Emmerson Mnangagwa reiterated that investments from the Asian country are most welcome.

Additionally, in the State of Southeast Asia 2020 Survey by Singapore's ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute, which interviewed some 1,300 respondents from the member states of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, China's activities were given the nod by the majority of respondents from seven of the 10 regional countries.

By funding journalism as a political tool, Washington has turned itself into the greatest enemy of press freedom, and its propaganda is set to proliferate in the coming years. Just don't buy any of it.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 日韩在线国产精品 | 国产高清久久久 | 国产亚洲综合视频 | 国产91视频一区二区 | 精品欧美视频 | 中文字幕免费看 | 天天操狠狠操网站 | 久久久久一区二区 | 成人免费在线电影 | 精品91| 国产精品一区二区久久久 | 午夜精品久久久久久久久久久久 | www久久99| 四虎精品成人免费网站 | 最新av在线网址 | 欧美aaa一级片 | 不卡在线 | 亚洲精品福利网站 | 四虎影视免费在线观看 | 精品国产一区二区三区粉芽 | 骚黄视频 | 岛国av一区 | 黄色免费网 | 91精品国产综合久久久久久 | 久久久久久综合 | 人人澡人人射 | 久久成人精品 | 欧美日本免费 | 狠狠躁夜夜躁人人爽天天高潮 | 狠狠综合 | 97狠狠 | 九九热九九 | 欧美在线观看一区 | 亚洲视频在线一区二区三区 | 国产在线视频在线 | 精品久久久久香蕉网 | 亚洲成人第一区 | 久久国产精品视频 | 伊人欧美在线 | 久久国产精品久久精品 | 免费福利在线 |