在线国产一区二区_成人黄色片在线观看_国产成人免费_日韩精品免费在线视频_亚洲精品美女久久_欧美一级免费在线观看

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Chen Weihua

The All-American Flag Act a sign of weakness, not strength, of the US

By Chen Weihua | China Daily | Updated: 2024-08-02 08:07
Share
Share - WeChat
An American flag flies outside of the US Capitol dome in Washington, US, Jan 15, 2020. [Photo/Agencies]

The All-American Flag Act signed into law by US President Joe Biden on Tuesday is aimed at promoting patriotism, but it actually exposes the sorry state of US politicians whose confidence in their own country seems to be weakening.

The act, introduced by Republican Senator Susan Collins of Maine and Democratic Senator Sherrod Brown of Ohio, mandates that the federal government purchase only those flags that are 100 percent made in the United States, compared with the previous requirement of just 50 percent.

If this is an example of US exceptionalism, it is certainly not in a good sense.

Americans are indeed patriotic. During my years of higher studies and work in and travel across the US, I saw more Americans displaying the national flag outside their apartment windows and in their yards and shops than I have seen in any other country, including in European countries.

The law has a strong anti-China tone because the US imports millions of flags from China — in 2017, it imported about 10 million national flags, with 99.5 percent of them coming from China.

The fact that China has not introduced legislation banning the production of US national flags due to those hostile US politicians shows China is much more open-minded, and less ideological and confrontational than the US government and lawmakers.

By demonstrating their country's strength through such a law, the US leaders and lawmakers are exposing their lack of confidence in their own country; in fact, the law is a sign of their weakness.

Senator Collins said: "the American flag serves as a symbol of our identity, resolve, and values as one people. To honor its significance, the federal government should only use flags entirely manufactured in the United States".

According to her logic, the flag act should be expanded to cover the US' state and local governments, because they too need to demonstrate their American identity and values. If so, should US lawmakers introduce bills that require the White House and the federal government to purchase only made-in-US furniture and office supplies? How about the suits, socks, shoes and underwear worn by the US president, because wearing 100 percent made-in-US clothes and shoes will make him look like a true POTUS to US citizens like Collins and Brown?

Or, how about a bill requiring US presidential campaigns to only use mementos made entirely in the US?

It is no secret that many items, from caps to T-shirts, sold in the Republican and Democratic parties' gift shops during presidential campaigns are made in China. I have seen firsthand the 2016 US presidential campaigns of former US secretary of state Hillary Clinton and former president Donald Trump. Many of the Made-in-China labels in the Democratic National Convention gift shops were removed beforehand to avoid controversy. The list of such deceitful activities is very long.

The argument made by the two senators that the flag act will help create jobs in the US is totally false, because it is against Econ101 principles of microeconomics on comparative advantage. The US-made flags are far more expensive than the imported ones. Forcing the US federal government to buy such expensive flags will only contribute to the ballooning of the US' national debt, which hit an astronomical $35 trillion on Monday.

The flag act is an attempt to cash in on the growing anti-trade and pessimistic sentiment among US citizens, because according to a Pew survey released on Monday, about 59 percent of Americans say the US has lost more than it has gained in terms of the cost and benefit of increased trade with other countries. And Gallup's Economic Confidence Index, also released on Monday, continues to show the long-term trend of negative public sentiment with regard to the current state and the future of the US economy.

But resorting to jingoism, in the name of promoting patriotism, and trade protectionism as reflected in the flag act will not help revive the US' manufacturing sector. Instead, it will make things worse. And that's why other countries have no interest in introducing such an absurd law.

The author is chief of China Daily EU Bureau based in Brussels.

chenweihua@chinadaily.com.cn

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 欧美三级在线视频 | 亚洲欧美精品一区 | 日本高清视频在线播放 | 日本高清视频一区二区三区 | 日日夜夜天天 | 国产一区视频在线 | 在线观看欧美一区 | 大陆一级毛片免费看 | 九九热免费精品视频 | 羞羞视频网 | 国产精品久久 | 极品少妇一区二区三区精品视频 | 亚洲精品午夜国产va久久成人 | 日韩精品观看 | 国产精品美女久久久久久久久久久 | 久久亚洲国产精品日日av夜夜 | 青草视频在线免费观看 | 中文字幕在线观看亚洲 | 午夜视频91 | 精品国产一区二区在线 | 精品1区| 亚洲午夜电影 | 日韩一区中文 | 亚洲精品午夜国产va久久成人 | 日韩av在线免费播放 | 国产精品一区二区三 | 在线一区二区三区 | 激情六月综合 | 绯色av一区二区三区在线观看 | 青草成人免费视频 | 日韩一区二区三区免费观看 | 欧美精品一区二区三区一线天视频 | 中文字幕成人在线视频 | 日韩在线中文 | 亚洲欧美日韩另类精品一区二区三区 | 久久精品久久久 | 国产男女视频在线观看 | 午夜国产精品成人 | 91精品国产91久久久久久密臀 | 中文字幕在线免费观看 | 九九免费视频 |