在线国产一区二区_成人黄色片在线观看_国产成人免费_日韩精品免费在线视频_亚洲精品美女久久_欧美一级免费在线观看

USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
China
Home / China / View

Climate change responsibilities

By Yang Fuqiang | China Daily | Updated: 2012-12-05 08:18

Developed countries should keep their promises to provide developing nations with funds and clean technology

There are disagreements about how developed nations should offer funding assistance to help developing nations combat the effects of climate change and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Whether substantial progress is made over the funding will help determine if the ongoing United Nations climate conference in Doha, Qatar, is a success or not.

The basis for such financial assistance is developed countries have emitted large volumes of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases since the start of the Industrial Revolution, gases that are viewed as a main cause of climate change and which are now at an impassable limit.

Despite their unshirkable political and moral responsibilities to offer considerable funds to the less-developed nations, which are the main victims of global greenhouse gas emissions, developed countries hold a bigoted and prejudiced attitude toward providing funds to developing countries, citing the possibility of developing nations using climate change as an excuse to acquire funding assistance for their economic development or other purposes.

Such an argument is groundless. Global losses caused by natural disasters and a degrading environment and ecosystem due to greenhouse gas emissions are enormous and the historical emitters should provide some compensation for the effects of their historical emissions. According to estimates by the World Bank and the United Nations Environment Program, developed countries should provide hundreds of billions of dollars a year to developing countries to compensate for the losses they have caused developing countries.

Actions taken by developing countries to tackle climate change - from forest protection and their efforts to adapt to a degrading environment and ease the impact of greenhouse gas emissions, to their efforts to acquire clean technology and train technological personnel - all need funding support from developed countries.

And so far, no developed nation has transferred technology to developing nations. But the proposal by developing nations that they can use the funds donated by developed countries to purchase some necessary technological patents from the private sector has opened a new approach for the realization of such technological transfers.

Although developed countries are reluctant to make any funding-assistance promises to developing nations, as indicated by the fruitless debates at the ongoing Doha conference, developing nations have put forward a few options: The first is the establishment of Fast Start finance for 2013 to 2015, as suggested by some Central African and island nations, a program similar to the $30 billion Fast Start finance for 2010 to 2012. The new finance should be $20 billion each year from 2013 to 2015, according to proponents. The second option, some developing nations suggest, is the establishment of a long-term funding mechanism, which would total $100 billion by 2020 - a commitment already made by developed countries at several climate conferences.

With the expiration of the first Fast Start finance at the end of this year, a majority of developed countries claim they have fulfilled their funding promises, some even claim their donations have exceeded their proposed commitment. However, the assistance has been much lower than promised. Some developing nations have also criticized the provision of the Fast Start finance as "fragmented across many channels", which, they said, has made its access and accountability extremely difficult to monitor. Many people even suspect that there was a lot of repackaging of old financial support in the Fast Start program, which violates the rules set up in Copenhagen that all the finance should be new and additional. According to a recent report by Oxfam, a British aid and development charity, only 33 percent of the money pledged for Fast Start is "new", and no more than 24 percent is "additional". Part of the money has come from the private sector rather than public finances, another violation of the Copenhagen spirit, the report said.

Thus, an objective and scientific assessment should be conducted to monitor the first Fast Start finance and its effects. Those countries that failed to fulfill their promises or misused donations should be held accountable. Such evaluation should also be applied to the different stages of long-term funding assistance.

Despite the establishment of the Green Climate Fund, which was established to provide support to developing countries to limit or reduce their greenhouse gas emissions and to adapt to the impacts of climate change, no donations have so far been made. Concrete quotas should be stipulated for developed countries to contribute to the fund.

There also exist disagreements between developed and developing nations on the management of the green program, with the developing nations saying it should be put under the administration of the UN climate change conference to increase its transparency. Developed countries argue that the World Bank or other international institutions should administer the fund and the fund's board of directors should lay down its management specifics.

The greenhouse gas emissions by developing nations are expected to rapidly rise with their economic development. That will possibly be used as an excuse by developed countries to reduce their funding assistance to developing nations. Thus, developing nations should strengthen South-South cooperation, technologically or in funding, and explore the establishment of a climate fund to enhance their unity and mutual support in tackling climate change.

The author is a senior energy, environment and climate consultant to the National Resources Defense Council.

Editor's picks
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 五月婷婷中文 | 日韩中文在线 | 久久精品国产99国产 | 九九在线视频 | 国产乱码精品一区二区 | 一级片av | 可以免费看黄的网站 | 欧美 日韩 国产 成人 在线 | 黄页网址免费观看 | 久久国产精品久久 | 狠狠av| 999国内精品永久免费视频 | 国产欧美久久一区二区三区 | 亚洲欧美日韩另类一区二区 | 国产精品久久久久国产a级 一区免费在线观看 | 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区免费 | 最新国产中文字幕 | 一区二区三区四区国产 | 中文字幕久久久 | 国产成人av一区二区 | 国产精品日产欧美久久久久 | www视频在线观看 | 欧美成人精品一区二区男人看 | 久久久99精品免费观看 | 色综久久 | 日韩成人在线观看 | 国产精品99久久久久久www | 久久精品123 | 久久com| 1000部精品久久久久久久久 | 国产成人精品免高潮在线观看 | 日韩电影免费在线观看中文字幕 | 久久人人爽人人爽 | 欧美h| 免费黄色在线 | 日韩一区二区三区在线观看 | 精品成人一区 | 青青草视频网站 | 国产高清一二三区 | avhd101在线成人播放 | 欧美日韩视频在线播放 |